Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1037

reference
604-tree-1
name
1037
tree-preservation-order

undefined

604-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023405 50.879879)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023362 50.879875,-1.023364 50.879883,-1.023370 50.879891,-1.023379 50.879897,-1.023391 50.879901,-1.023404 50.879902,-1.023417 50.879901,-1.023429 50.879897,-1.023439 50.879891,-1.023445 50.879884,-1.023447 50.879876,-1.023446 50.879867,-1.023440 50.879860,-1.023430 50.879854,-1.023419 50.879850,-1.023405 50.879848,-1.023380 50.879853,-1.023371 50.879859,-1.023364 50.879867,-1.023362 50.879875)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL